Product Plan

Leave a comment

October 17, 2011 by huionn

After spending 2 months in exploration of a few web technologies (JSF and GWT), I come to a conclusion that rich web application is too costly to develop. Although it has the pros of easy deployment (or zero deployment), the development process is painful – UI design, data binding, compilation, server restart, manual testing and debugging…

Instead, I decide to develop a 3-tiered rich client application using NetBeans Platform. The client communicates with server through web services (REST).

  • NetBeans Platform is easier to learn and develop compared to Eclipse RCP. To me, its programming model is more intuitive.
  • Client application allows multi-tasking – for example, user can continue to work while waiting for document uploading in queue.
  • The business logics in server can be reused for web UI and client UI.
  • The load on server could be lower.
  • The deployment could be done through JWS (with the prerequisite JRE installed).
  • NetBeans Platform provide auto and alternatively manual update which will somehow minimize the hassles of patching.
  • Rich client can easily provide better usability, look-and-feel and is more responsive.

From my years of experience in web application development, the cost of developing complex web application is high. Although it is possible to design a modular system, it is very hard to design a loosely-coupled modular web UI. The result is that many unrelated modules need to be deployed even it is not used by current development. It makes the application turnaround painfully long.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: